Meet the Nguyens: a common Orlando story
Tuan Nguyen moved into an Orlando assisted living community two years ago. His three adult children split the monthly bill between them, quietly, the way families do. By the time Tuan's health declined further and the family began looking at Medicaid to help cover a nursing facility, the children had paid roughly $48,000 out of pocket. Nothing was ever written down. No note, no ledger, no agreement about repayment.
The Nguyens are a composite, not an actual Truestead client, but their situation is one I see constantly. The children want to know two things: can Dad pay them back once he qualifies for Medicaid, and if he does, will that repayment cause a problem with his application? The honest answer is that it depends entirely on what happened at the time the money was paid, and whether it can be documented as a real debt.
Have this exact situation? Talk it through with a Florida attorney — the 20-minute consultation is free.
Book Free Consult or call (888) 388-8445Why undocumented family payments look like gifts
Florida's Medicaid program, like every state's, looks back five years from the date of application to check whether the applicant gave away assets for less than what they were worth. That rule is well known. What surprises families is that this same scrutiny applies in reverse, to money the applicant might later pay back to someone.
When adult children cover a parent's bills without any paperwork, the caseworker reviewing the file has no way to tell the difference between a family member being generous and a family member making a real loan. Florida's Department of Children and Families, which administers Medicaid eligibility, generally presumes that money moving between family members with no agreement, no interest, and no repayment schedule was a gift at the time it was given. That presumption matters later, because if the parent then writes the children a $48,000 check to "pay them back," DCF has to ask: pay them back for what? Without a note predating the payments, there is no debt on the books to repay. The check can be read as the parent gifting money away, which is exactly the kind of uncompensated transfer that can trigger a penalty period of Medicaid ineligibility.
What a proper promissory note would have looked like
Had the Nguyen siblings wanted to structure their help as a loan to Tuan rather than a gift of their own money, they needed a written promissory note signed before the first payment went out the door. Federal Medicaid rules, which Florida follows, require a loan between family members to meet specific conditions to avoid being treated as a disguised gift:
- The loan term cannot outlast the lender's life expectancy.
- Payments must be made in equal installments over the life of the loan, with no interest-only periods, no deferred payments, and no lump-sum balloon payment at the end.
- The debt cannot be automatically forgiven if the lender dies before it is repaid.
A note that skips any of these features, even one that is otherwise in writing, risks being treated as an uncompensated transfer to the extent it fails the test. This is a narrow, technical area, and the paperwork has to be right from the start. It cannot be recreated after the fact to match what already happened.
Can Dad repay the kids now without being penalized?
This is the question the Nguyen siblings actually asked, and it has two different answers depending on the facts.
If there had been a compliant promissory note in place before the payments were made, then Tuan repaying his children later is not a gift at all. It is Tuan paying off a legitimate debt, which Florida Medicaid treats the same as paying any other bill: an acceptable use of his own money that does not trigger a transfer penalty. Repaying a real debt is one of the accepted forms of spend down, alongside things like paying off a mortgage, fixing a roof, or buying a reliable vehicle.
Without that note, the analysis changes. A large payment from Tuan to his children, with no documented obligation behind it, looks like an outright gift made within the five-year lookback window. DCF is very likely to count it as an uncompensated transfer and calculate a penalty period based on the amount, using the state's transfer penalty divisor for the year the transfer is assessed. That penalty period is a stretch of time during which Medicaid will not pay for care, even though the applicant is otherwise financially eligible.
In the Nguyens' actual situation, because there was no note in place before the $48,000 was spent, a straightforward repayment now would have been treated as a gift. The family avoided that outcome by taking a different path.
How the Nguyens cleaned it up: the caregiver contract alternative
Because the money had already been spent with no note in place, our office worked with the family on a different tool entirely: a personal care agreement, sometimes called a caregiver contract. This is a written agreement, signed before any future services are rendered, in which the parent pays a family member a fair, documented rate for care or care-coordination services actually being provided going forward.
A caregiver contract does not retroactively fix the $48,000 already spent. That money remained, for planning purposes, a completed gift from the children to their father, and the family accounted for it honestly in the Medicaid application timeline rather than trying to disguise it as a loan repayment. But the contract did two useful things going forward: it let Tuan compensate one of his children fairly for ongoing help with appointments, paperwork, and care oversight, and it gave the family a clean, documented paper trail for any future payments, so there would be no repeat of the original problem.
Frequently Asked Questions
The Truestead Takeaway
The Nguyens' situation is more common than most families realize, and it usually comes from generosity rather than any attempt to game the system. Once money has already been paid without a note, it typically has to be treated honestly as a gift for Medicaid purposes, but families still have real options going forward, including caregiver contracts and properly structured promissory notes for future payments. The lesson is to put an agreement in writing before the first check is written, not after. If your family is already covering a parent's care costs, or is considering it, a conversation with a Florida elder law attorney before more money changes hands can prevent a much harder conversation later.
Have a child turning 18? Get the free 18 & Protected packet — the legal documents every Florida 18-year-old needs.
Get the Free PacketTalk to a Florida Attorney
Every family’s situation is different. Schedule a consultation with Arthur Simpson, Esq. to review your plan and your options under Florida law.
Schedule a Consultation →This article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice, nor does reading it create an attorney-client relationship. Florida estate, elder, probate, and real estate law are fact-specific and change over time. Consult a licensed Florida attorney about your individual circumstances. Arthur Simpson, Esq. is licensed to practice law in the State of Florida. Attorney advertising.
Talk to a Florida Attorney — Free 20-Minute Consultation
Pick a time below. No obligation, no pressure — just answers.